Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Effective for Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors

By News Release


Researchers at Moffitt Cancer Center are investigating new treatment approaches primary lung neuroendocrine tumors, which are very rare and represent about 1-2% of all lung cancer cases. In a new article published in the International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, and led by Daniel Oliver, MD, and Stephen Rosenberg, MD, shows that stereotactic body radiotherapy, or SBRT, is an effective treatment for patients with early stage lung neuroendocrine tumors.

SBRT is a treatment approach that delivers high doses of radiation to precise areas of a tumor, minimizing damage to surrounding normal cells. Patients receiving SBRT often have less toxicity and side effects compared to treatment with conventional radiotherapy that is delivered in smaller doses each day over several weeks.

“SBRT is commonly used as a treatment for early stage non-small cell lung cancer, and our results show strong tumor control. This suggests that SBRT may also be effective for lung neuroendocrine tumors,” said Dr Oliver, assistant member of the Department of Radiation Oncology at Moffitt. “In fact, SBRT is increasingly being used to treat early stage lung neuroendocrine tumors in clinical practice, despite the lack of consensus recommendations for this approach and very limited data on its effectiveness and toxicity in lung neuroendocrine tumor patients.”

Because of the lack of data, Dr Oliver and his team wanted to assess the efficacy and long-term outcomes of SBRT in patients with lung neuroendocrine tumors. They performed a retrospective analysis of 48 lung neuroendocrine tumors from 46 patients who were treated with SBRT from 11 institutions across the US. The researchers discovered that SBRT provided strong local/regional tumor control. The three-, six- and nine-year local control rates with SBRT were 97%, 91% and 91% respectively, and only one regional recurrence occurred. The treatment was also well tolerated with only one case of SBRT-related toxicities reported, which was considered low-grade.

Since lung neuroendocrine tumors are so rare, it is difficult to conduct clinical trials for these patients. Therefore, a randomized trial will likely never be conducted to compare SBRT to surgery. Despite this, the results from the study are comparable to historical populations of lung neuroendocrine tumor patients who were treated with surgery, which is particularly notable given that many patients treated with SBRT typically have additional health conditions that can make treatment difficult and result in poorer outcomes.

“The current study is the largest and first multi-institutional series evaluating local control, toxicity and dosimetric outcomes with SBRT for early stage lung neuroendocrine tumors. Our results suggest that while surgery provides excellent outcomes, SBRT should be considered another treatment option for this patient population,” said Dr Rosenberg, study senior author and director of MRI guided radiotherapy in Moffitt’s Department of Radiation Oncology.